“Eat the Rich and Save the Whales”: The Coward Billionaire Pierre Omidyar Pops the Hypocrisy Breaker (again), Wikileaks sets the overthrow of a second dictator in motion, and a genuine, no-faux hero waits in the wings
January 26th, 2011
Yesterday, as the coward billionaire
and monumental hypocrite Baron Pierre “PeeWee” von OMidyar
was watching “Eat the Rich & Save the Whales” for the first time, I was watching
some video of him. It’s on a website called, aptly and hilariously,
Money Control, and you can and certainly
should go here to watch it.
At 2:03 in Part 2,
the following exchange begins
(I’ve redacted comments specific to India,
where he is being interviewed, for the sake of brevity,
but I haven’t altered a word of
Baron von OMidyar’s):
Q: You’re fairly passionate
about governance, about government transparency.
You have always made it the core of your philanthropic activity.
Why is that so important?
OMidyar: I really believe
government transparency, and our work there,
and the work that many people are doing there, is very very
important. Because we can’t forget that the role of government is
to serve the people. And the information that comes from government
is public information, which means that it belongs to the people. Yeah. So
we really believe that for societies to advance, for democracy to work,
people have to have access to information…It’s very very important.
We think that giving people access to information is
going to make government better…Increasing
the level of transparency can
really help society.
Q: How do you
measure success in government
transparency?
OMidyar: I would say
that you will find more effective
governance keeping people accountable,
actually. So elected officials and heads of ministries
and bureaucrats and so forth, actually paying attention to,
Are they delivering the services their agencies are supposed to
deliver? Are they following up on their commitments? So it’s very
clear in a democracy that the only way the government will be effective
is if people hold it accountable. And the only way people can hold it accountable
is if they have information about how it’s working…Individual privacy is what
matters, not governmental privacy. And I would say that in the case of
Wikileaks…my concerns about how the government has reacted are
even greater. And I think we have to be very very careful — you
know, it’s our government, it’s a democracy. It’s our
government! They’re there to serve us!
And so when a government reacts
in a way that brings tremendous pressure on an agency
that is trying to publish information about how it’s working, even if
that information was leaked, right, in the United States we have the freedom
of the press, it’s a Constitutional protection, it’s very very important.
And so I’m concerned about government overreach and
overreaction and pressure to suppress
information that it doesn’t like.

If you’re like almost
everyone watching or reading those
words, you’re thinking, “Admirable stance,
my good fellow. You’re a lovely chap even if you
are a bit of a hoarder!” And that’s precisely what Pierre
OMidyar wants you to think. He’d rather you overlook a teeny
fact: he personally cut off the ability of people all over the world to
donate to Wikileaks — which Time magazine has said “could become as
important a journalistic tool as the Freedom of Information Act” –
via his company Paypal, which was the conduit far and away
used by the most people genuinely supportive of
governmental transparency to support
the organization.
So that video interview,
posted January 17th, pops the circuit
breaker for OMidyar hypocrisy yet again.
It’s not the first time. It likely won’t be the last.
He recently persuaded the editor of his newspaper —
that’s right, OMidyar is the publisher of the Honolulu Civil Beat –
a man named John Temple who used to edit the Pulitzer
Prize-winning Rocky Mountain News, to publish
this absolutely flabbergasting editorial
about the Wikileaks stink.
The editorial, like the interview above,
expresses an altogether feigned concern on OMidyar’s
part about governments oppressing people who strive for transparency
and accountability. And smack in the middle, it includes the revelation that
no government was involved in crushing Wikileaks in America: Pierre OMidyar and
Amazon’s Jeff Bezos accomplished that all by themselves. Bezos took Wikileaks
off the Amazon cloud of servers, and OMidyar stepped on their financial
oxygen hose. In other words, a pair of men made billionaires
by the open web closed it, for three hundred
million people, by themselves.
Just in case you’re not
convinced by me or by Time magazine’s
view of Wikileaks, here are the views of Reporters
Without Borders and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.
They, like that other august journalistic enterprise New
York Times in this editorial, were decidedly troubled
by the acts of censorship undertaken
by Bezos and OMidyar.
You’re reading this,
mind you, on a day when for the second
time in weeks a Wikileaks-inspired overthrow of
the tyrannical government of a repressed country is underway.
That country is Egypt, where a genuine hero, Mohamed Elbaradei,
is waiting in the wings to lead if his country is successful in ejecting Hosni
Mubarak. Hillary Clinton and the US government would like to put
the kibosh on that; she indicated that yesterday by saying,
“The Egyptian government is looking for ways to
respond to the legitimate needs…
of the…people.” Try telling
that to anyone in the
Arab world, or
anyone awake
elsewhere.

Borders,
nationalities have no meaning
to me right now, frankly. I live in the European Union.
I go from one country to another without a visa. It’s a domestic flight.
Whether they speak French or Greek, it doesn’t really
matter. Can you expand that to be
Yes.
Psychology
is as important as substance.
If you treat people with respect, they will go out
of their way to accommodate you. If you treat them in
a patronizing way, they will go out of their
way to make your life
difficult.
Once you
give every person the right
to live in freedom, peace, and dignity,
a lot of the problems we see
today are going to
evaporate.



[...] Pierre Omidyar, turned off Wikileaks in America [...]
[...] this, read this also, and watch the feature [...]
[...] crimes……………………………………………..high crimes……………………………and gutless wanking [...]