Pam Omidyar Saves the Whales! Chapter the Fourteenth of “Eat the Rich & Share the Wealth”: Hunger vs. Hypocrisy
June 16th, 2010
You may recall
that some time ago I offered billionaire
hypocrite Pam Omidyar an opportunity to save the whales
she so dearly loves. She didn’t take it. And evidently she was made
jumpy by having people pay attention to the hypocritical
words she utters, because she deleted her Twitter
account (I’ve saved some gems for you,
which are below).
It’s a big honking
responsibility to be a billionaire.
It’s a position of enormous power, and power
isn’t easy to come by in this world. It comes in myriad forms,
but fundamentally they all boil down to these three:
popularity power, military power,
or monetary power.
One hot blonde cheerleader
can wrap a whole high school around her pinky finger;
a clever shaman or guru can control an entire village or sect; a charismatic
Harvard-educated politician can turn a Presidential election into his own 747,
a guaranteed fortune for generations of his family, and crackerjack
bodyguards for life. That’s popularity power,
and on the Earth in 2010,
it’s real.
If you’ve got a big
standing army or a passel of ICBMs
or some squadrons of F-16s, you can holler “Jump!”
at folks, and they’ll salute and holler back, “Sir, how high, sir?!”
If they fail to satisfy you with their jumping or their saluting or their sir-ing,
you can raze their hamlets and rape their women and bayonet
their children. That’s military power, and
on the Earth in 2010,
it’s very real.
And if you’ve got money,
you can buy up some of the most
respected and coveted newspapers and
media outlets in the world and fill them from
front to back with tired, hateful, cynical slop, and
people will still pull out your chair for you and feed you
the finest cuts of Kobe beef: just ask Rupert Murdoch. If you’ve
got money, you can fill a nation’s cities with vulgar skyscrapers, equip
them all with faux-gold toilet fixtures, plaster your name all over them, and
run your stubby fingers over every vapid beauty contestant in the land: just ask
Donald Trump. If you’ve got money, you can openly crush every competitor your
business has, no matter how wretched your product, stifle innovation
everywhere you see it, and then polish your personal reputation
to a high luster in short order by simply passing out some
vaccinations and mosquito nets and a small portion
of your plunder: just ask Bill Gates. That’s
monetary power, and on the Earth
in 2010, boy howdy is
it ever real.
Pam Omidyar has
beaucoup monetary power.
She’s half of Pam and Pierre Omidyar,
the multi-billion dollar fortune spawned in
a few short years by Ebay. Pam is a bit of a hypocrite,
alas, and she’s also My Personal Billionaire. She’s a hypocrite
for reasons I’ve outlined at considerable length in the first
thirteen chapters of “Eat the Rich & Share the Wealth” —
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 – and she’s My Personal
Billionaire because she’s lovable, relative to
most billionaires, and because her
hypocrisy sticks in my
craw the worst.
Hypocrisy among the
powerful is turrible stuff. If you have
the power to stop setting other people’s daughters
on fire with your war machines — and Barack Obama does –
and you don’t do it, well, that’s turrible. If you have the power to
keep people from having their limbs amputated with
hacksaws, sans anesthesia, and Pam Omidyar did,
and you don’t pull the trigger, that’s
turrible, turrible indeed.
And if you have the power
to save the whales, and the same gal does,
and you don’t do it, well, heck — your children should
at least be able to read about your “let them eat
whale sashimi” attitude toward
the world.
Herein, therefore,
yet another in a long line of
attempts to reform My Personal Billionaire,
or die trying (more on that part shortly). Someone else
will have to take on the hard cases like Jeff Bezos or Larry Ellison
or Paul Allen — my pet project is Pam Omidyar, and thus do I announce, in the
quiet calm of this little website, exactly how Pam Omidyar can save the
whales. That’s right, one little redheaded girl, shy, retiring,
a biologist and surfer and mommy, can save all the
whales on the planet Earth from being murdered
with exploding harpoons. Hard
to believe, isn’t it?
But it’s true.
But first let’s establish
that this is an idea that even Pam
(since it’s her dough that’s involved) should be able
to get behind. Here’s Pam, and some of her fab tweets from
@pamomidyar over the last few months, before she got
all shy about saying one thing and doing
another and deleted her
Twitter account:
All right, then.
That’s just plain as day.
Pam Omidyar cares about the fishes
and the dolphins and the whales and the deep
blue sea. She also hates guns, which is
precisely what exploding
harpoons are:
And hey, by gosh,
she doesn’t just believe in jabbering
about stuff, she believes
in action, too:
Most important of all,
she believes in going big! For the children!
(Because what child wants to see the world’s most
magnificent mammals torn apart
by exploding harpoons?)
So Pam Omidyar loves
the ocean and its creatures and believes
with all her heart in going BIG after big goals and in leaving
a proper legacy for our children, right? She establishes that beyond
a shadow of a doubt with her own words. So naturally she’ll be up for saving
the whales! Knowing all that, I went to the greatest savior of whales
this planet has ever seen, Paul Watson, founder of the the
Sea Shepherd Conservation Society,
and I asked him:
In short order
I got back a very complete
answer:
Paul’s email is long
and substantial and filled with charts
and tables and calculations. Before we tell Pam
Omidyar how little money it would take to save the whales,
and how infinitesimally tiny a portion of her net
worth it is, a bit about Paul
and Sea Shepherd:
Paul Watson’s bona fides
as an environmentalist and a defender
and savior of marine mammals are beyond dispute.
One of the original founders of Greenpeace, he left when it
became clear that they were about hanging banners and he was
about getting in between marine mammals and their
murderers. What he’s done in the three-plus
decades since is well encapsulated by
this screen grab from
his email:
There’s no need
for me to comment on that.
Just for emphasis, though, read
the first two paragraphs
again:
No injuries,
no criminal convictions,
no lawsuits; whaling by five nations shut down;
whaling by two remaining damaged; thousands of whales saved.
I refer anyone with further doubts about Sea Shepherd or Paul to SeaShepherd.org,
or to Whale Wars or Wikipedia. He knows what he’s doing — if you get between
the whale and the harpoon, the whale can’t be harpooned.
That’s what they do at Sea Shepherd.
It’s that simple, and
it works.
So, Pam Omidyar,
without further ado, here is the number
Paul Watson and Sea Shepherd need from your purse
to save all whales from commercial whaling on the
planet Earth, from 2010 going
forward in perpetuity:
$57,700,000.00.
For that eminently
affordable price — a sandwich, in your terms —
here’s what you get:
Except ever so much more so.
Because as Captain Watson details in the
report I requested, with a little financial help,
Sea Shepherd can completely end whaling on planet
Earth. They just need a few things: a third long range vessel
for the Sea Shepherd navy, 60 to 80 metres, ice strengthened, heli-equipped,
capable of launching small interception boats, complete and in service by fall 2010;
annual re-fits of its three vessels and three helicopters; the non-negotiable fuel, berthage,
and port fees that are an enormous part of their operating budget; the tiny crew fees that
are a smaller part of their operating budget (and which can always be negotiated
downward, the commitment of these folks being what it is); upgraded satellite
systems for all three vessels to enable instantaneous transmission of video
and images; full coverage of all sea and air operating expenses for 2011
and 2012, the first two years in hundreds of years in which not
one whale will be killed for commercial purposes on Earth,
thanks directly to you; and the establishment of a
modest Permanent Fund to fully provide an
operating budget for the Sea Shepherd
three-vessel three-heli navy
going forward.
I have the whole budget
here if you’d like to read it; you know how to reach me.
But maybe instead of picking through that, you should get off your
hypocritical duff and write a check — a check you won’t
feel, a check which will
allow this:
That would result directly
in results like these, only increased substantially
in number, and compounded over time…
…as well as expansion
and massively increased effectiveness of
all other Sea Shepherd campaigns — dolphins, baby harp seals,
sharks, bluefin tuna, Galapagos, and the Gulf Rescue Campaign —
as well as the campaigns which we all know are going
to come, the state of the oceans
being what it is.
That amount is —
if the Forbes 400 is correct in its
estimation of your wealth as the 40th richest
American, at $5,500,000,000 — roughly 1% of your
net worth. Is saving the largest and smartest and most
harmless mammals on Earth worth 1% of your massive fortune
to you, Pam? Put another way, could you part with one-tenth of the
interest on your fortune this year to “go big” and seal the deal on saving
the whales? And to “enable the service of others”, which enabling will do for the
bluefin tuna and the shark what it has historically done for whales? Is the
ocean worth 1% to you, you who surf and wear blue and sign Save the
Whales petitions and celebrate “The Cove”? Would you like
to save whale sharks from being finned for soup and left
to sink and die, which very much needs doing, too?
Is any or all of that worth one-tenth of the
interest on your fortune
this year?
If it is, let me know,
and whaling can end this very year.
These are the janjaweed, Pam:
These are the peacekeepers
who follow the janjaweed all over the world
and keep them from killing:
If there were
a janjaweed killing mammals near you –
say, native Hawaiians — ripping their meat from their bones,
selling it in open markets in Honolulu, and feeding it to the Omidyar children
in their school lunches — which is precisely what the Japanese do
with whale meat in Tokyo and Kyoto and Hokkaido —
would 1% of your massive fortune be
available to stop it?
If you’re paying any
attention to what the IWC is up to this week,
you understand how apropos is this sentence from Dr. Martin Luther King:
“This is no time to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.” The
janjaweed are gathering strength. If ending the janjaweeding
of the whales isn’t worth a tenth of the interest on your
fortune this year, then carry on
with your hypocrisy.
I’ve asked you to do
some things like this before, and you
do listen to the requests, but you never act.
This time, I offer you this tiny added incentive:
I promise you that from the time I post this until I hear
from Sea Shepherd that you’ve made a financial
commitment to save the whales,
I won’t eat again. Ever,
if necessary.
I know you’re shy
and retiring and wouldn’t want
to be made the subject of a big public hunger
strike. So I won’t climb a tree near your house in Honolulu
and unfurl a banner. I’ll do this as quietly as I possibly can and still
have you know it’s going on. Let’s call it Hunger Against Hypocrisy. This will
be the quietest one man hunger strike to save the whales the world has ever seen,
or will see, until either (a) you’ve made a commitment to get off your crazy-rich ass
and save the whales and make a significant contribute to the health of the ocean
that you so claim to love, or (b) someone in my family posts the
notice of my death by starvation. Until one of
those occurs, I’ll just be
here, hungry.
Send me a new email address —
for some curious reason, my emails to all your
previously working addresses are bouncing at the moment! —
and I’ll email you a photo or video privately from time to time so you can
see how far out my ribs are sticking, just so there’s no question that I’m keeping
my promise. Otherwise, I won’t bother you. This post will be here.
The opportunity will be here: maintain your hypocrisy
and starve a man to death in the bargain,
or end it and save the whales.
Had you given a damn
when I began talking to you about
EarthNationLive over six years ago, Sea Shepherd
would’ve been fully funded and long ago ended whaling on Earth,
Fabienne Jean would be a ballerina rather than the tender of the Pam Omidyar
Memorial Stump today, and a whole lot else would be different. But let’s look forward.
Given what’s written here, you own the world’s whales from this date forward.
Do you prefer them dead? Or alive, these the largest mammals on Earth,
the smartest, the most peaceful, the ones who sing songs that
travel all the way around the world, the ones
who have enduring friendships,
just as we do?
Do tell.
Try to go big, and to
enable the service
of others.
When a great moment
knocks on the door of your life, it is often no
louder than the beating of your heart,
and it is easy to miss it.
Boris Pasternak
Cautious, careful people,
always casting about to preserve their reputation
and social standing, never can
bring about a reform.
Susan B. Anthony
The healthy being craves
an occasional wildness, a jolt from normality,
a sharpening of the edge of appetite,
a brief excursion from
his way of life.
Robert MacIver
What is more mortifying
than to feel you’ve missed the plum for want
of courage to shake the tree?
Logan Pearsall Smith
Act boldly and
unseen forces will come
to your aid.
Dorothea Brande


















[...] hypocrite Pam Omidyar about how may she oughta do something about the damn oceans instead of just twitter and yap about it that gets on her nerves like people always chapping Tony’s ass about a little yachting during [...]
[...] to my long-standing question: What would happen to a person in the [...]
[...] $57,700,000 campaign by [...]
[...] something to save them. Judging [...]
[...] interrupt the Baroness Pam Omidyar’s callous disregard for the lives of the whales (but not the hunger strike, now past ten days, I’m-a eat my [...]
[...] 14 [...]
[...] How is that you do not respect living beings [...]
[...] they’re sick and tired of Pam Omidyar’s multi-billionaire boo-hoo hypocrisy [...]
[...] “the Whore of Babble-on” for her hypocritical stance on ocean issues. [...]