Woman or mouse, Pam Omidyar? Where are you in this tale?

March 23rd, 2010

pamomidyar


Democracy,

a system ideally designed

to challenge the status quo, has been

corrupted and tamed to slavishly serve the status

quo. We have undergone, as John Ralston Saul writes, a coup d’état

in slow motion. And the coup is over. They won. We lost. The abject failure

of activists to push corporate, industrialized states toward serious environmental

reform, to thwart imperial adventurism or to build a humane policy toward

the masses of the world’s poor stems from an inability to recognize

the new realities of power. The paradigm of power has

irrevocably altered and so must the

paradigm of resistance

alter.


Too many

resistance movements

continue to buy into the facade

of electoral politics, parliaments, constitutions,

bills of rights, lobbying and the appearance of a rational

economy. The levers of power have become so contaminated that

the needs and voices of citizens have become irrelevant. The election

of Barack Obama was yet another triumph of propaganda over substance

and a skillful manipulation and betrayal of the public by the mass media. We

mistook style and ethnicity – an advertising tactic pioneered by the United

Colors of Benetton and Calvin Klein – for progressive politics and

genuine change. We confused how we were made to feel with

knowledge. But the goal, as with all brands,

was to make passive consumers

mistake a brand for an

experience.


Obama,

now a global celebrity,

is a brand. He had almost no experience

besides two years in the senate, lacked any moral core

and was sold as all things to all people. The Obama campaign was

named Advertising Age’s marketer of the year for 2008 and edged out

runners-up Apple and Zappos.com. Take it from the professionals. Brand

Obama is a marketer’s dream. President Obama does one thing and

Brand Obama gets you to believe another. This is the essence

of successful advertising. You buy or do what the

advertisers want because of how they

can make you feel.


We live in a culture

characterized by what Benjamin DeMott

called Junk Politics. Junk politics does not demand justice

or the reparation of rights. It always personalizes issues rather than

clarifying them. It eschews real debate for manufactured scandals, celebrity

gossip and spectacles. It trumpets eternal optimism, endlessly praises our moral

strength and character, and communicates in a feel-your-pain language.

The result of junk politics is that nothing changes, “meaning zero

interruption in the processes and practices that

strengthen existing, interlocking systems

of socioeconomic

advantage.”


The cultural belief

that we can make things happen

by thinking, by visualizing, by wanting them,

by tapping into our inner strength or by understanding

that we are truly exceptional is magical thinking. We can always make

more money, meet new quotas, consume more products and advance our career

if we have enough faith. This magical thinking, preached to us across the

political spectrum by Oprah, sports celebrities, Hollywood, self-help

gurus and Christian demagogues, is largely responsible for our

economic and environmental collapse, since any

Cassandra who saw it coming

was dismissed as

“negative.”


This belief,

which allows men and women

to behave and act like little children,

discredits legitimate concerns and anxieties.

It exacerbates despair and passivity. It fosters a state

of self-delusion. The purpose, structure and goals of the corporate

state are never seriously questioned. To question, to engage in criticism

of the corporate collective, is to be obstructive and negative. And it has

perverted the way we view ourselves, our nation and the natural

world. The new paradigm of power, coupled with its bizarre

ideology of limitless progress and impossible happiness,

has turned whole nations, including

the United States, into

monsters.


We can march

in Copenhagen. We can join

Bill McKibben’s worldwide day of climate

protests. We can compost in our backyards and hang

our laundry out to dry. We can write letters to our elected officials

and vote for Barack Obama, but the power elite is impervious to the charade

of democratic participation. Power is in the hands of moral and intellectual trolls

who are ruthlessly creating a system of neo-feudalism and killing the

ecosystem that sustains the human species. And appealing

to their better nature, or seeking to influence the

internal levers of power, will

no longer work.


We will not,

especially in the United States,

avoid our Götterdämmerung. Obama, like Canada’s

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the other heads of the

industrialized nations, has proven as craven a tool of the corporate

state as George W. Bush. Our democratic system has been transformed into

what the political philosopher Sheldon Wolin labels inverted totalitarianism.

Inverted totalitarianism, unlike classical totalitarianism, does not revolve around

a demagogue or charismatic leader. It finds expression in the anonymity of the

corporate state. It purports to cherish democracy, patriotism, a free

press, parliamentary systems and constitutions while

manipulating and corrupting internal levers

to subvert and thwart democratic

institutions.


Political candidates

are elected in popular votes by citizens

but are ruled by armies of corporate lobbyists in

Washington, Ottawa or other state capitals who author the

legislation and get the legislators to pass it. A corporate media controls

nearly everything we read, watch or hear and imposes a bland uniformity of opinion.

Mass culture, owned and disseminated by corporations, diverts us with trivia,

spectacles and celebrity gossip. In classical totalitarian regimes, such as

Nazi fascism or Soviet communism, economics was subordinate to

politics. “Under inverted totalitarianism the reverse is true,”

Wolin writes. “Economics dominates politics – and with

that domination comes different forms

of ruthlessness.”


Inverted

totalitarianism wields total

power without resorting to cruder forms

of control such as gulags, concentration camps or

mass terror. It harnesses science and technology for its dark

ends. It enforces ideological uniformity by using mass communication

systems to instill profligate consumption as an inner compulsion and to substitute

our illusions of ourselves for reality. It does not forcibly suppress dissidents, as long as

those dissidents remain ineffectual. And as it diverts us it dismantles manufacturing

bases, devastates communities, unleashes waves of human misery and ships jobs

to countries where fascists and communists know how to keep workers

in line. It does all this while waving the flag and mouthing patriotic

slogans. “The United States has become the showcase

of how democracy can be managed without

appearing to be suppressed,”

writes Wolin.


…The philosopher

Theodor Adorno wrote that the exclusive

preoccupation with personal concerns and indifference

to the suffering of others beyond the self-identified group is what

ultimately made fascism and the Holocaust possible: “The inability to identify

with others was unquestionably the most important psychological

condition for the fact that something like Auschwitz could

have occurred in the midst of more or

less civilized and innocent

people.”


The indifference

to the plight of others and the

supreme elevation of the self is what the

corporate state seeks to instill in us. It uses fear,

as well as hedonism, to thwart human compassion. We

will have to continue to battle the mechanisms of the dominant

culture, if for no other reason than to preserve through small, even

tiny acts, our common humanity. We will have to resist the temptation

to fold in on ourselves and to ignore the cruelty outside our door. Hope endures

in these often imperceptible acts of defiance. This defiance, this capacity to say

no, is what the psychopathic forces in control of our power systems seek

to eradicate. As long as we are willing to defy these forces we have

a chance, if not for ourselves, then at least for those who

follow. As long as we defy these forces we remain

alive. And for now this is the

only victory possible.


Chris Hedges



krugman

teahupoo_1


My kingdom for a

billionaire with

balls — or

ovaries.


Leave a Reply

One Response to “Woman or mouse, Pam Omidyar? Where are you in this tale?”